Forever and ever ago I came across this article, which really got me thinking about how I categorize Cynosure – there’s big romance in it, but I’d always categorized it as a Historical Fantasy. Truth is, the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it’s both. The romance drives decisions that influence the fantasy (the historical being more setting than legitimate plot) plot, while the fantasy influences the characters in how they respond to the romance parts. Both plots resolve at the same point in our outline. To avoid confusion, I’ll keep it as a Historical Fantasy – but to me it’ll always be a Historical Fantasy (Romance).
But I kept thinking about how a romance functions in a story. I’ve always liked writing stories where there’s already a little meat to the romantic plot. Where the characters know one another, so there’s a history to toy with while they move forward; but I’ve also had problems with that. Cynosure went through a (three page, haa) draft where Rosaline and Max weren’t involved at all at the beginning of the story – interestingly enough, there was almost no tension there, contrary to the crazy amounts of romantic tension between the characters when they’d already kissed.
LTWF’s Susan Dennard wrote a post (a lil more recently than the other blog post I linked) on THE KISS as a turning point in a novel. We all know why; THE KISS is a catalyst for a release of all the emotions we’ve been hearing in-POV up to that point. I really enjoyed it – a lot because of my aforementioned insecurities about having started a YA book where the main love interests were already in a relationship (albeit a secret one). While I was reading it – and under the umbrella of the first post I linked – I realized something really important: THE KISS doesn’t have to be THE KISS. THE KISS is a turning point tailored to your story, to your character. There can be a metaphorical moment to stand in for THE KISS. It just has to be a release point. Tension has to build towards it, like any climactic moment.
Because romance, like any other part of a story, is built from conflict. We’ve all read the archetypal romances: the Romeo and Juliet romance, the Pride and Prejudice romance, and the Fairytale romance. Respectively, conflict is built as such:
- Romeo and Juliet Romance – Two characters are in love but external forces keep them apart, requiring emotional and/or physical sacrifice to bring them together (potentially eternally) in the end. “I’ll Do Anything For You”
- Pride and Prejudice Romance – Two characters are thrown together in a misunderstanding, and must sacrifice personal opinion/belief/personality traits in order to be together. “I’ll Be Anything For You”
- Fairytale Romance – One character is in a situation that they are unable to navigate, and conflict stems from the other character rectifying that situation. “I’ll Always Save You”
They’re effective in different ways, though the second one is the one I find to be cropping up in YA the most – which makes sense. Teenagers are learning how to read people, and how to read themselves. They make stupid mistakes, and being insecure, that creates a lot of tension (as I’m – though not for much longer – nineteen myself, I speak from potentially recent experience : P). And, because it’s automatically internal conflict, that makes character development a key factor in the story automatically. I think the hardest part about it is making it interesting: I’m of the mind that in P&P, neither Darcy nor Lizzy actually hated the other. They misunderstood one another, and were placed in embarrassing situations that hurt their pride, and then reacted in a way that caused the other one to feel their pride hurt more until they reached their THE KISS; aka. THE LETTER. They’re responsible for the unease between them. And responsibility is key, because later, when they cop to that responsibility, that’s when there’s both resolution and growth.
The Fairytale, in the meanwhile, is more effective with spins. Right now I personally think that the reconciliation of the “messed up” boy/girl is probably the best example of a modern-day fairytale. Just take the prince saving the princess who’s asleep in the tower and switch it to the significant other doing whatever they can to snap the boy/girl out of their depression/anger/etc. And, of course, they don’t have to have happy endings; the Little Mermaid didn’t get saved by her prince, and YA teens can drown just as easily. I think it’s brilliant. Conflict stems from being unable to act, so it forces the character to grow by trying out different ways of being in search of salvation, whether the POV is the significant other or the boy/girl.
For Cyno, though, the most crucial plot is the Romeo and Juliet. Which I realized only recently. Rosaline and Max are attracted to one another when the story begins; they love one another in their own ways, but aren’t in love. Their love story is about how they fall in love, and fight for that love, and the resolution comes when they achieve it. Just because they’re in a relationship already doesn’t mean they have nowhere to grow (silly Kae!). It means that they’re growing in a slightly different direction than the Pride and Prejudice plot focused romance market. Their THE KISS won’t be a kiss. It’ll be something else, some other wonderful physical manifestation of everything we put them through (getcher head outta that gutter).
So what do I think makes a romance tick? Conflict and sacrifice (physical, emotional or personal). Building tension to a resolution. Using metaphor effectively to represent catalysts for that tension and resolution. You know. All those things we always read about, but takes so very, very long to sink in.
What makes your romance tick? Or the romances you like best! Any particular sacrifices or archetypal plot?


